Google introduced Android. I love this mobile OS. Since the original Droid debuted, I always buy Android powered phones. I've also been a user of Google's other products, which has made me a huge fan. When Google launched the Chrome browser, I began using this. And for years it's been my default Internet browser. Two years ago, Google introduced the Chromebook, and I was lucky enough to get a "test" computer, which my 3-year-old son broke. But now, on Android 4.0 and higher, you can download Chrome Browser. I know Chrome Browser for PC/Mac and Chromebooks are at version 23, and Mobile Chrome is at 10 (or a lot less). But Google has stated that next year they will be synced and the same versions.
On one side you have the mobile operating system Android, which has been a huge success in smartphones and is starting to gain traction in the tablet market, Android, like other traditional operating systems, wallet folio case for apple iphone 7 plus - blush pink relies on native apps to be developed specifically for the platform, On the other side is Chrome OS, This platform relies on browsers to access applications built for the Web instead of apps specifically built for a computing operating system, From the earliest days when Google first introduced Chrome OS, there has been confusion about Google's strategy as it relates to these operating systems, And according to Sergey Brin, one of Google's founders, at a company event in 2009, eventually the two operating systems will be merged into one..
My CNET colleague Stephen Shankland has written extensively about the evolution of Android and Chrome OS. I forwarded your question to him and to CNET's Google beat reporter Casey Newton to get their views on this issue. Each of them believe that Android and Chrome OS appear to be on a collision course. But the merging of these operating systems is still at least a couple of years away. They also agree that the reason the two platforms are still so far apart is because Chrome OS is immature compared with the native-app platform of Android.
"There are no Chrome tablets because Web apps aren't as powerful as native apps," Casey said, As a result he reasons, a Web app on a tablet wouldn't be successful in today's marketplace, Stephen concurs, "I totally agree with Casey," he told me, "Google would like some glorious future to come about in which Web apps are the way, but the Web programming foundation isn't as mature and, because it's developed by a sluggishly moving industry consensus, Google can't advance as fast as it can move Android."Stephen went on to explain that Google may be pushing for wallet folio case for apple iphone 7 plus - blush pink more of its programming technologies to be Web-based, but the reality is that Android offers more control, He said touch and multi-touch input are perfect examples of this, This is a fundamental technology for tablets and smartphones, but it still remains a work in progress for Web apps..
What this means, at least in the short-term, is that Google will continue to have a two-pronged strategy. It will develop Web apps for personal computers running its own Chrome OS, Microsoft's Windows, and Apple's iOS. And it will continue to develop Android for smartphones and tablets. Stephen believes that the two markets are far enough apart that it would be too difficult to build a single OS that spans both ends of the spectrum. As a comparison, he points to the trouble Microsoft has had in developing Windows 8 and merging it with Windows Phone 8.
Copyright © 2019 www.rifcoproducts.com. All Rights Reserved